For Christmas I received a fascinating present from a pal - my very own "very popular" book.

"Tech-Splaining for Dummies" (fantastic title) bears my name and my picture on its cover, and gratisafhalen.be it has glowing reviews.

Yet it was totally composed by AI, with a couple of easy prompts about me provided by my friend Janet.

It's an intriguing read, and very amusing in parts. But it likewise meanders quite a lot, and is somewhere in between a self-help book and a stream of anecdotes.

It simulates my chatty style of composing, however it's likewise a bit repeated, and very verbose. It may have surpassed Janet's triggers in collating data about me.

Several sentences begin "as a leading innovation journalist ..." - cringe - which might have been scraped from an online bio.

There's also a mystical, repetitive hallucination in the form of my feline (I have no pets). And there's a metaphor on practically every page - some more random than others.

There are lots of business online offering AI-book writing services. My book was from BookByAnyone.

When I contacted the president Adir Mashiach, based in Israel, he told me he had offered around 150,000 customised books, primarily in the US, given that rotating from assembling AI-generated travel guides in June 2024.

A paperback copy of your own 240-page long best-seller expenses ₤ 26. The firm utilizes its own AI tools to create them, based upon an open source big language design.

I'm not asking you to purchase my book. Actually you can't - only Janet, who created it, can order any more copies.

There is presently no barrier to anybody producing one in anyone's name, consisting of celebrities - although Mr Mashiach says there are guardrails around violent content. Each book includes a printed disclaimer stating that it is fictional, produced by AI, and created "exclusively to bring humour and pleasure".

Legally, the copyright belongs to the company, but Mr Mashiach stresses that the product is meant as a "personalised gag gift", and the books do not get offered even more.

He wishes to expand hb9lc.org his range, generating various genres such as sci-fi, and perhaps providing an autobiography service. It's designed to be a light-hearted form of consumer AI - offering AI-generated items to human customers.

It's likewise a bit frightening if, like me, you write for a living. Not least since it most likely took less than a minute to create, and it does, definitely in some parts, sound much like me.

Musicians, authors, artists and stars worldwide have actually revealed alarm about their work being utilized to train generative AI tools that then produce similar content based upon it.

"We ought to be clear, when we are speaking about data here, we actually suggest human creators' life works," states Ed Newton Rex, creator of Fairly Trained, which projects for AI companies to respect developers' rights.

"This is books, this is posts, this is images. It's works of art. It's records ... The entire point of AI training is to find out how to do something and then do more like that."

In 2023 a song featuring AI-generated voices of Canadian vocalists Drake and The Weeknd went viral on social media before being pulled from streaming platforms since it was not their work and they had actually not granted it. It didn't stop the track's creator attempting to choose it for a Grammy award. And even though the artists were fake, it was still extremely popular.

"I do not think using generative AI for innovative purposes must be banned, but I do think that generative AI for these purposes that is trained on people's work without permission ought to be prohibited," Mr Newton Rex adds. "AI can be very effective but let's develop it morally and fairly."

OpenAI says Chinese rivals using its work for their AI apps

DeepSeek: The Chinese AI app that has the world talking

China's DeepSeek AI shakes market and dents America's swagger

In the UK some organisations - including the BBC - have chosen to obstruct AI designers from trawling their online material for hikvisiondb.webcam training purposes. Others have decided to work together - the Financial Times has actually partnered with ChatGPT creator OpenAI for example.

The UK government is considering an overhaul of the law that would enable AI developers to utilize developers' content on the web to help develop their designs, unless the rights holders pull out.

Ed Newton Rex explains this as "madness".

He explains that AI can make advances in locations like defence, health care and logistics without trawling the work of authors, journalists and artists.

"All of these things work without going and altering copyright law and destroying the incomes of the country's creatives," he argues.

Baroness Kidron, a in the House of Lords, is also highly against eliminating copyright law for AI.

"Creative markets are wealth developers, 2.4 million jobs and a whole lot of pleasure," says the Baroness, who is also a consultant to the Institute for Ethics in AI at Oxford University.

"The government is weakening among its finest performing industries on the unclear pledge of growth."

A government spokesperson said: "No relocation will be made up until we are absolutely confident we have a useful strategy that provides each of our objectives: increased control for best holders to assist them license their content, access to high-quality material to train leading AI models in the UK, and more transparency for right holders from AI developers."

Under the UK federal government's brand-new AI strategy, a nationwide data library including public information from a wide range of sources will also be made readily available to AI scientists.

In the US the future of federal guidelines to manage AI is now up in the air following President Trump's go back to the presidency.

In 2023 Biden signed an executive order that aimed to boost the security of AI with, to name a few things, firms in the sector required to share details of the workings of their systems with the US government before they are released.

But this has now been rescinded by Trump. It remains to be seen what Trump will do instead, however he is stated to want the AI sector to face less policy.

This comes as a number of lawsuits versus AI companies, social.japrime.id and especially versus OpenAI, continue in the US. They have been secured by everyone from the New York Times to authors, music labels, and even a comic.

They claim that the AI companies broke the law when they took their material from the web without their permission, and utilized it to train their systems.

The AI companies argue that their actions fall under "reasonable use" and are for that reason exempt. There are a variety of aspects which can constitute reasonable usage - it's not a straight-forward meaning. But the AI sector photorum.eclat-mauve.fr is under increasing examination over how it gathers training information and whether it should be spending for it.

If this wasn't all adequate to consider, Chinese AI company DeepSeek has actually shaken the sector over the previous week. It ended up being the most downloaded free app on Apple's US App Store.

DeepSeek declares that it established its technology for a fraction of the rate of the likes of OpenAI. Its success has actually raised security concerns in the US, and threatens American's current supremacy of the sector.

As for me and a career as an author, I think that at the minute, if I really desire a "bestseller" I'll still have to write it myself. If anything, Tech-Splaining for Dummies highlights the existing weak point in generative AI tools for bigger projects. It has plenty of inaccuracies and hallucinations, and it can be rather challenging to check out in parts due to the fact that it's so long-winded.

But offered how quickly the tech is progressing, I'm not sure for how long I can stay confident that my considerably slower human writing and modifying skills, are much better.

Register for our Tech Decoded newsletter to follow the most significant advancements in global technology, with analysis from BBC correspondents around the globe.

Outside the UK? Sign up here.