Secure.gov sites use HTTPS A lock (Lock Locked padlock) or https:// indicates you've safely connected to the.gov website. Share delicate info only on official, protected websites.

- About - The Chief law officer

• Organizational Chart
• Budget & Performance - History
• Privacy Program
  mortgagecalculator.org
  - Press Releases
• Speeches
• Videos
• Photo Galleries
• Blogs
• Podcasts
  
  - Guidance Documents
• Forms
• Publications
• Information for Victims in Large Cases
• Justice Manual
• Business and Contracts
  
  - Why Justice?
• Benefits
• DOJ Vacancies
• Legal Careers at DOJ
  
  Utilities
  
  - About About
  
  Our Work
  
  - Contact the Division Contact the Division
  
  Report a Violation
  
  - Cases and Matters
• Press Room Press Room
  
  Videos
  
  Publications
  
  - Employment Opportunities Employment Opportunities
  
  Experienced Professionals
  
  Attorney General ´ s Honors Program
  
  Volunteer and Paid Student Internship Programs
  
  - Civil Liberty FOIA Civil Liberty FOIA
  
  Emmett Till Act/Cold Case Memoranda
  
  - En español
  
  - About - title=" About" About
• The Chief law officer
• Organizational Chart
• Budget & Performance
• History
• Privacy Program
  
  - title=" News" News
• Press Releases
• Speeches
• Videos
• Photo Galleries
• Blogs
• Podcasts
  
  - title=" Guidance & Resources" Resources
• Guidance Documents
• Forms
• Publications
• Information for Victims in Large Cases
• Justice Manual
• Business and Contracts
  
  - Employment
• Why Justice? - Benefits
• DOJ Vacancies
• Legal Careers at DOJ
  
  - Our Offices
• Find Help
• Contact Us
  
  Breadcrumb
  
  1. Justice.gov
• Civil Liberty Division
• The Fair Housing Act
  
  The Fair Housing Act
  
  - Facebook
• X.
• LinkedIn.
• Email
  
  The Fair Housing Act, 42 U.S.C. 3601 et seq., restricts discrimination by direct suppliers of housing, such as landlords and property business in addition to other entities, such as towns, banks or other loan provider and house owners insurer whose prejudiced practices make housing unavailable to persons because of:
  
  race or color. faith. sex. national origin. familial status, or. special needs.
  
  In cases including discrimination in mortgage loans or home enhancement loans, the Department might submit suit under both the Fair Housing Act and the Equal Credit Opportunity Act. The Department brings cases where there is proof of a pattern or practice of discrimination or where a denial of rights to a group of individuals raises a concern of general public significance. Where force or danger of force is utilized to reject or disrupt fair housing rights, the Department of Justice might institute criminal procedures. The Fair Housing Act also supplies treatments for dealing with individual problems of discrimination. Individuals who think that they have been victims of a prohibited housing practice, may file a grievance with the Department of Housing and Urban Development [HUD] or submit their own lawsuit in federal or state court. The Department of Justice brings fits on behalf of individuals based on from HUD.
  
  Discrimination in Housing Based Upon Race or Color
  
  One of the central objectives of the Fair Housing Act, when Congress enacted it in 1968, was to restrict race discrimination in sales and rentals of housing. Nevertheless, more than 30 years later, race discrimination in housing continues to be a problem. The bulk of the Justice Department's pattern or practice cases involve claims of race discrimination. Sometimes, housing suppliers attempt to disguise their discrimination by providing false info about availability of housing, either saying that nothing was available or guiding homeseekers to certain locations based upon race. Individuals who get such false information or misdirection might have no knowledge that they have actually been victims of discrimination. The Department of Justice has actually brought numerous cases alleging this type of discrimination based on race or color. In addition, the Department's Fair Housing Testing Program looks for to discover this kind of hidden discrimination and hold those responsible liable. Most of the mortgage loaning cases brought by the Department under the Fair Housing Act and Equal Credit Opportunity Act have actually declared discrimination based on race or color. Some of the Department's cases have also alleged that towns and other regional government entities breached the Fair Housing Act when they rejected authorizations or zoning changes for housing advancements, or relegated them to primarily minority communities, since the prospective locals were anticipated to be predominantly African-Americans.
  
  Discrimination in Housing Based Upon Religion
  
  The Fair Housing Act forbids discrimination in housing based upon religious beliefs. This restriction covers instances of obvious discrimination against members of a specific faith too less direct actions, such as zoning ordinances developed to restrict the usage of private homes as a locations of praise. The variety of cases filed given that 1968 alleging spiritual discrimination is small in comparison to a few of the other prohibited bases, such as race or nationwide origin. The Act does consist of a minimal exception that allows non-commercial housing operated by a spiritual company to reserve such housing to persons of the same religion.
  
  Discrimination in Housing Based Upon Sex, Including Unwanted Sexual Advances
  
  The Fair Housing Act makes it unlawful to discriminate in housing on the basis of sex. In current years, the Department's focus in this area has actually been to challenge sexual harassment in housing. Women, particularly those who are bad, and with limited housing options, often have little recourse however to endure the embarrassment and degradation of unwanted sexual advances or risk having their households and themselves eliminated from their homes. The Department's enforcement program is focused on proprietors who produce an illogical living environment by demanding sexual favors from tenants or by creating a sexually hostile environment for them. In this way we look for both to acquire relief for tenants who have been treated unfairly by a property owner due to the fact that of sex and also deter other possible abusers by making it clear that they can not continue their conduct without facing repercussions. In addition, prices discrimination in mortgage loaning might likewise negatively affect women, particularly minority females. This type of discrimination is illegal under both the Fair Housing Act and Equal Credit Opportunity Act.
  
  Discrimination in Housing Based Upon National Origin
  
  The Fair Housing Act restricts discrimination based upon nationwide origin. Such discrimination can be based either upon the country of a person's birth or where his or her ancestors originated. Census data indicate that the Hispanic population is the fastest growing sector of our country's population. The Justice Department has taken enforcement action against municipal governments that have tried to lower or restrict the variety of Hispanic families that may live in their neighborhoods. We have actually taken legal action against loan providers under both the Fair Housing Act and the Equal Credit Opportunity Act when they have actually imposed more rigid underwriting standards on mortgage or made loans on less favorable terms for Hispanic borrowers. The Department has likewise sued lenders for discrimination against Native Americans. Other locations of the nation have experienced an increasing variety of nationwide origin groups within their populations. This consists of new immigrants from Southeastern Asia, such as the Hmong, the former Soviet Union, and other portions of Eastern Europe. We have done something about it against personal property managers who have discriminated against such individuals.
  
  Discrimination in Housing Based Upon Familial Status
  
  The Fair Housing Act, with some exceptions, prohibits discrimination in housing against households with children under 18. In addition to restricting an outright denial of housing to households with children, the Act likewise prevents housing companies from imposing any special requirements or conditions on renters with custody of children. For example, property owners might not locate households with children in any single portion of a complex, place an unreasonable constraint on the overall variety of individuals who may live in a residence, or restrict their access to recreational services provided to other tenants. In the majority of circumstances, the changed Fair Housing Act prohibits a housing service provider from refusing to rent or sell to households with children. However, some centers might be designated as Housing for Older Persons (55 years of age). This type of housing, which satisfies the standards stated in the Housing for Older Persons Act of 1995, might run as "senior" housing. The Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) has actually released regulations and extra assistance detailing these statutory requirements.
  
  Discrimination in Housing Based Upon Disability
  
  The Fair Housing Act forbids discrimination on the basis of disability in all kinds of housing deals. The Act specifies persons with an impairment to imply those individuals with mental or physical disabilities that considerably limit one or more major life activities. The term psychological or physical disability might consist of conditions such as loss of sight, hearing disability, mobility disability, HIV infection, psychological retardation, alcohol addiction, drug addiction, persistent tiredness, learning disability, head injury, and mental disorder. The term major life activity might consist of seeing, hearing, walking, breathing, performing manual tasks, taking care of one's self, discovering, speaking, or working. The Fair Housing Act likewise safeguards individuals who have a record of such a disability, or are concerned as having such a problems. Current users of unlawful illegal drugs, persons founded guilty for unlawful manufacture or circulation of an illegal drug, sex offenders, and juvenile transgressors are ruled out handicapped under the Fair Housing Act, by virtue of that status. The Fair Housing Act pays for no securities to individuals with or without impairments who present a direct threat to the individuals or residential or commercial property of others. Determining whether someone presents such a direct danger needs to be made on a customized basis, nevertheless, and can not be based upon general assumptions or speculation about the nature of a special needs. The Division's enforcement of the Fair Housing Act's securities for individuals with specials needs has actually concentrated on two significant areas. One is guaranteeing that zoning and other regulations worrying land use are not used to hinder the residential choices of these people, consisting of needlessly restricting communal, or gather together, property arrangements, such as group homes. The 2nd location is insuring that freshly built multifamily housing is integrated in accordance with the Fair Housing Act's accessibility requirements so that it is available to and usable by individuals with impairments, and, in particular, those who utilize wheelchairs. There are other federal statutes that forbid discrimination versus people with specials needs, including the Americans with Disabilities Act, which is enforced by the Disability Rights Section of the Civil Rights Division.
  
  Discrimination in Housing Based Upon Disability Group Homes
  
  Some individuals with impairments may live together in congregate living arrangements, often referred to as "group homes." The Fair Housing Act prohibits municipalities and other local government entities from making zoning or land usage choices or executing land use policies that exclude or otherwise discriminate versus people with impairments. The Fair Housing Act makes it illegal--
  
  - To use land usage policies or actions that deal with groups of persons with impairments less favorably than groups of non-disabled persons. An example would be a regulation prohibiting housing for individuals with disabilities or a specific kind of disability, such as mental disorder, from finding in a particular location, while enabling other groups of unrelated people to cohabit because location.
• To act versus, or reject a license, for a home due to the fact that of the impairment of individuals who live or would live there. An example would be denying a building authorization for a home because it was meant to supply housing for individuals with mental retardation.
• To refuse to make sensible lodgings in land use and zoning policies and treatments where such lodgings may be required to afford individuals or groups of persons with specials needs an equivalent opportunity to utilize and enjoy housing. What makes up a sensible accommodation is a case-by-case decision. Not all asked for adjustments of guidelines or policies are sensible. If a requested adjustment imposes an excessive monetary or administrative concern on a regional government, or if a modification develops a fundamental change in a regional federal government's land usage and zoning plan, it is not a "sensible" lodging.
  
  Discrimination in Housing Based Upon Disability-- Accessibility Features for New Construction
  
  The Fair Housing Act defines discrimination in housing against individuals with impairments to include a failure "to create and build" particular brand-new multi-family houses so that they are accessible to and functional by individuals with disabilities, and especially individuals who use wheelchairs. The Act needs all recently constructed multi-family homes of 4 or more systems meant for very first occupancy after March 13, 1991, to have particular features: an available entrance on an accessible path, accessible typical and public usage areas, doors sufficiently large to accommodate wheelchairs, accessible paths into and through each home, light switches, electric outlets, and thermostats in available area, reinforcements in restroom walls to accommodate grab bar installations, and functional kitchen areas and restrooms set up so that a wheelchair can steer about the area.
  
  Developers, contractors, owners, and architects responsible for the style or construction of brand-new multi-family housing might be held liable under the Fair Housing Act if their structures fail to fulfill these design requirements. The Department of Justice has actually brought many enforcement actions versus those who failed to do so. Most of the cases have actually been solved by authorization decrees offering a variety of kinds of relief, including: retrofitting to bring unattainable functions into compliance where practical and where it is not-- alternatives (financial funds or other construction requirements) that will offer for making other housing units available