OpenAI and the White House have accused DeepSeek of utilizing ChatGPT to inexpensively train its new chatbot.
- Experts in tech law state OpenAI has little recourse under intellectual home and agreement law.
- OpenAI's terms of usage might apply however are mostly unenforceable, they say.
Today, disgaeawiki.info OpenAI and the White House implicated DeepSeek of something comparable to theft.

In a flurry of press statements, they said the Chinese upstart had bombarded OpenAI's chatbots with questions and hoovered up the resulting data trove to rapidly and cheaply train a design that's now almost as excellent.

The Trump administration's leading AI czar stated this training process, called "distilling," amounted to copyright theft. OpenAI, yewiki.org meanwhile, informed Business Insider and other outlets that it's investigating whether "DeepSeek might have inappropriately distilled our models."

OpenAI is not stating whether the company plans to pursue legal action, wiki.vifm.info rather guaranteeing what a representative described "aggressive, proactive countermeasures to safeguard our technology."

But could it? Could it take legal action against DeepSeek on "you took our material" grounds, much like the premises OpenAI was itself sued on in a continuous copyright claim submitted in 2023 by The New York City Times and macphersonwiki.mywikis.wiki other news outlets?

BI presented this question to professionals in innovation law, who said tough DeepSeek in the courts would be an uphill struggle for OpenAI now that the content-appropriation shoe is on the other foot.

OpenAI would have a tough time proving a copyright or [users.atw.hu](http://users.atw.hu/samp-info-forum/index.php?PHPSESSID=534f9f14bdda643cbef43881bc354e55&action=profile